Legal Opinion

State v. Raines

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1976No. 7510SC979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendants contend that the trial court erred by admitting into evidence the crowbar, owner’s manual, warranty, antenna and plastic bag found in the automobile in which defendants were riding when they were arrested. Defendants argue that the relevancy of evidence was “remote and conjectural” and that admission of the objects into evidence invited prejudice. This contention is unfounded.

There was sufficient competent evidence presented at trial to prove that in the early hours of 2 May 1975 the Firestone Store in Raleigh was broken into and that valuable articles were stolen…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. . FoglemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. State v. FoglemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. People v. GenrichColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API