Legal Opinion

State v. Woods

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1975No. 13PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant first assigns as error the action of the trial court in allowing the State to challenge peremptorily without cause more than nine jurors. It was stipulated that the State peremptorily excused eleven jurors and the record shows that the defendant peremptorily excused thirteen. The trial court ruled that the State had twenty-two peremptory challenges and that the defendant had thirty-four.

Defendant was charged with two capital crimes and one non-capital.

G.S. 9-21 in part provides:

“(a) In all capital cases each defendant may challenge peremptorily without cause 14 jurors…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. People v. WilderMichigan Supreme Court · 1981

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API