Legal Opinion

State v. Fogleman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1933PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The prisoner neither testified nor introduced any witness, and at the close of the evidence offered by the State he moved to dismiss the action as in case of nonsuit. O. S., 4643. The ground upon which the motion was made is the insufficiency of the testimony tending to identify the prisoner as the man who shot and killed the deceased; and the asserted insufficiency is based upon the assumption that the testimony of identity, as given by Mrs. Carter, is the product of imagination in part and in part of auto-suggestion. Whence it is argued that this Court should recognize the failure of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. State v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. State v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. State v. . ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. SwiftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. GraysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API