William Wolff & Co. v. Canadian Pacific Railway
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, setting aside a default and judgment. John F. Finn, Judge, granting original motion, January 25, 1889. J. M. Seawell, Judge, granting order of October 25, 1895, appealed from. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
PRINGLE, C.
Appeal from an order setting aside default and judgment, with bill of exceptions. Judgment by default was entered on July 17, 1888. A motion was seasonably made to set aside default and judgment, and on January 25, 1889, an order was made that the “motion be and the same is hereby granted on condition that defendant pay to plaintiff the sum of sixteen dollars and fifty cents costs and seventy-five dollars counsel fees within ten days.” “And ordered that the proposed answer on file stand as the answer.” A tender of the whole amount, ninety-one dollars and fifty cents, was made…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Utt v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Judson v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Loughborough v. McNevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Randol v. TatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Chapman v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Berry v. Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Courteney v. Standard Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Reeves v. HutsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.