Legal Opinion

McGlashan v. Spade Rockledge Terrace Condo Development Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1980No. 79-779PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The Court of Appeals determined that the trial court had committed reversible error in both its charge to the jury and in its refusal to allow appellees to cross-examine appellant’s engineer regarding compliance with a local land planning ordinance.

The disputed jury instructions concern an upper landowner’s rights and obligations with respect to the flow of diffused surface water. In resolving this controversy, it is appropriate that we first review the development of the law regarding surface water rights.

Historically, American courts have adopted two diametrically opposed doctrines to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Armstrong v. Francis Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Keys v. RomleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. DeetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. City of Houston v. Renault, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Currens v. SleekWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Currens v. SleekWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Davis v. WidmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Franklin County District Board of Health v. PaxsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API