Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Renault, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1968No. B-408PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

Renault, Inc., Renault Distributors, Inc., and Hughes-Peters, Inc., as successor to Sterling Motors, Inc., brought this suit against the City of Houston, Southern Pacific Railroad and Port Terminal Railroad to recover damage caused to 1,620 Renault and Peugeot automobiles and trucks by the impounding of surface waters on the land where the vehicles were stored. The trial court rendered judgment on the jury verdict that the plaintiffs take nothing. Plaintiffs appealed only as to the judgment in favor of the city. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Fort Worth Improvement District No. 1 v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  4. City of Abilene v. DownsTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Miller v. LetzerichTexas Supreme Court · 1932

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. JenningsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Tarrant Regional Water District v. GraggTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hubler v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cameron v. CameronTexas Supreme Court · 1982

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API