Legal Opinion

Burns v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1955No. S. F. 19242Published

1Opinion of the Court

45 Cal.2d 296 (1955)

EMMETT R. BURNS, Petitioner,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

S. F. No. 19242.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Oct. 21, 1955.

Emmett R. Burns, in pro. per., and Eugene H. O'Donnell for Petitioner.

William E. Mussman and Garrett H. Elmore for Respondent.

THE COURT.

In response to a writ of review, the Board of Governors of The State Bar has presented the record of the proceeding which is the basis of its recommendation that Emmett R. Burns be disciplined by suspension from the practice of law for six months.

The charges of professional misconduct grow out of Burns'…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Fish v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Peck v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Fall v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Stanford v. the State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API