Legal Opinion
Rogers v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 31, 2011No. Nos. 07-273L, 07-426L, 08-198L, 10-187L, 10-200LPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON VALUATION
WILLIAMS, Judge.
These Fifth Amendment taking actions come before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment for a determination of the proper method for valuation of property. In a previous opinion, the Court determined that the Government was liable for a taking of Plaintiffs’ property pursuant to the National Trails System Act Amendments of 1983 (“Trails Act”). See Rogers v. United States, 90 Fed.Cl. 418, 434 (2009). The parties dispute the measure of “just compensation” due to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Ybanez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Geneva Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.