Legal Opinion
Howard v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 16, 2012No. 09-575LPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The plaintiffs, who claim property interests along a rail line in Cass and Pulaski Counties, in Indiana, filed a complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims alleging that the government caused uncompensated takings of their property interests pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The plaintiffs premise their claim on the on the United States Department of Transportation Surface Transportation Board’s (STB) issuance of a Notice of Interim Trail Use (NITU) pursuant to the National Trails System Act (Trails Act), 16…
2Cases cited145 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jack Ladd and Marie Ladd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Ellamae Phillips Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- BAUER v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- BEDWELL v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.