Thompson v. Schlittenhart
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Harvey and Dorothy Thompson brought this action against their neighbors, Edgar and Dorothy Schlittenhart, for damages for trespass and to quiet title to two strips of land along the boundary between the parties' properties. The trial court heard testimony and entered findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment that a survey performed by William Baumgras set out the true boundary.
The facts are that prior to 1936, both properties were owned by Elmer and Jane Conger. In May 1936, they conveyed what is now the Schlittenhart property to Lulu Conger and, in September 1936, what is now the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Hirt v. EntusWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Ghione v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Cook v. HenslerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Martin v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Rinehold v. RenneWashington Supreme Court · 2021
- Valencia v. LundgrenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.