Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
This is a consolidated quiet title action 1 involving the interests of Bellingham Bay and British Columbia Railroad Company (BB & BC) in two strips of land in Bellingham: an 80-foot strip reserved by the BB & BC on an 1889 plat map and included in a 1905 quitclaim deed, and a 50-foot strip included only in the 1905 quitclaim deed. The plaintiff-appellant, Roeder Company (Roeder), and the defendants-respondents 2 trace their claims back through different chains of title to a common grantor, BB & BC. We affirm the trial court and hold that BB & BC retained a fee interest in the 80-foot strip by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ridgeview Properties v. StarbuckWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Veach v. CulpWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Morsbach v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Zobrist v. CulpWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lawson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Harris v. Ski Park Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Kiely v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Roeder Co. v. K & E Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.