Legal Opinion

State v. Cannon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 13, 1974No. 83482; 83484; 83485; 83486; 83489PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

The defendants were indicted for promoting gambling in the second degree. ① Prior to the trial they demurred to the indictments on the ground the indictments faded to state facts sufficient to state a crime. ② The court did not rule on the demurrers at that time. A jury trial was held, and verdicts of guilty were returned. At a later hearing, following further arguments on the demurrers, the court entered judgments in which it sustained the demurrers, set aside the convictions, dismissed the indictments and denied leave to resubmit the cases to the grand jury. The state appeals.

Defendants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. EyleOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. HaasOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. SieckmannOregon Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. State v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. City of Toldeo v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API