Legal Opinion

State v. Eyle

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1963PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

Defendant was indicted for the violation of ORS 164.670. Trial was had without a jury before the Circuit Court of Umatilla County. Prom a judgment finding him guilty as charged, defendant appeals. The facts are not in dispute.

Defendant’s argument upon appeal is that the prosecution failed to prove a necessary element of the crime of using a motor vehicle without authority; that the defendant took the automobile “without intent to steal it.” ORS 164.670 provides:

“Every person who takes or uses without authority any vehicle without intent to steal it, or is a party to such unauthorized taking…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. State v. PettyIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. People v. NovoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. NaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. State v. EastepOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  4. In re Lakeysha P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Spencer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API