Legal Opinion

State v. Sieckmann

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1968PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The defendant was prosecuted under an indictment charging him with rape of his daughter. At the foot of the indictment the name of Roseanna Estelle Sieckmann is listed as a witness examined before the grand jury. She apparently was the wife of the defendant. Defendant moved to dismiss the indictment upon the ground that it was “obtained by adducing privileged testimony to the Grand Jury.” No evidence in any form was submitted by either party. The trial court dismissed the indictment and granted leave to resubmit to the grand jury. The state appeals.

The defendant contends that the state has no…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. CarusoOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. State v. SieckmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. GangiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API