Legal Opinion
State v. House
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 14, 1978No. DA 135942, CA 11042PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.
The court sustained defendant’s demurrer to a criminal complaint. The state appeals pursuant to ORS 138.060(1). See State v. Thomas, 34 Or App 187, 578 P2d 452, rev den (1978).
Defendant was charged with violating ORS 164.045, by complaint, as follows:
"The said defendant, on or about June 12, 1977, in Multnomah County, State of Oregon, did unlawfully and knowingly attempt to commit theft of Two (2) pharmaceutical items, Two (2) containers of soap, One (1) container of wax and Five (5) foodstuff items, of the total value of less than Two Hundred Dollars, the property of Fred Meyer, Inc.”
Defendan…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. ShadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. HubbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. LinthwaiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- City of Portland v. AzizCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. PondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.