State v. Haas
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
The defendant was convicted pursuant to a jury trial of the crime of first degree burglary. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial ① because the trial court allowed information obtained by the police in violation of Miranda v. Arizona ② to be used to impeach defendant’s testimony. This court granted review for the sole purpose of determining whether information secured in violation of Miranda rules can be used for impeachment purposes under the circumstances which existed in this case.
Two bicycles were stolen from houses in the Moyina Heights district of Klamath Falls. One…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. NeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Murphy v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.