Legal Opinion

Mauck v. Northwestern National Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1929No. Docket No. 3969PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

The appellant’s assignors and grantors owned a house and lot in the unincorporated city of Graham, in Los Angeles County. The dwelling-house was insured by the owners for $2,500 against loss by fire. The policy contained the following condition: “Unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed hereon . . . this company shall not be liable for loss or damage occurring . . . while mechanics or artisans are employed in building or altering or repairing the described premises for more than fifteen days at any one time ... or wdiile a building herein described whether intended…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Halpin v. . Phenix Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Herrman v. . Adriatic Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Cummins v. . Agricultural Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Limburg v. German Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Moore v. Phœnix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Breuning v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. County of Los Angeles v. RansohoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Foley v. Sonoma County Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Ruffino v. Queen InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Terwilliger v. Union Fire, Accident & General Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API