Mauck v. Northwestern National Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
The appellant’s assignors and grantors owned a house and lot in the unincorporated city of Graham, in Los Angeles County. The dwelling-house was insured by the owners for $2,500 against loss by fire. The policy contained the following condition: “Unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed hereon . . . this company shall not be liable for loss or damage occurring . . . while mechanics or artisans are employed in building or altering or repairing the described premises for more than fifteen days at any one time ... or wdiile a building herein described whether intended…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Halpin v. . Phenix Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Herrman v. . Adriatic Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Cummins v. . Agricultural Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Limburg v. German Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Moore v. Phœnix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Breuning v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- County of Los Angeles v. RansohoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Foley v. Sonoma County Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Ruffino v. Queen InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Terwilliger v. Union Fire, Accident & General Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.