Legal Opinion
Breuning v. Berry
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 1956No. Civ. 8863PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Ernest D. Breuning, County Surveyor of Shasta County, and as such having exclusive jurisdiction within the unincorporated area of said county to issue building permits and enforce the provisions of division 13, part 3, chapter 2, of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, commonly known as the Riley Act, commenced an action to compel defendants above named to secure a building permit for a planing mill constructed by defendant Scott Lumber Company in unincorporated area in Shasta County.
Defendants filed an answer setting forth that said corporation was not required by said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- City of Los Angeles v. Rancho Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Lawrence v. FultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- McKenzie v. BrandonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Meyer v. Board of Trustees of San Dieguito Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Jaynes v. StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Noroian v. Department of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- California Grape & Tree Fruit League v. Industrial Welfare CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.