Legal Opinion
Foley v. Sonoma County Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance
California Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 1941No. Sac. 5464PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the trial court in favor of plaintiff, Ellen Foley, in an action upon a policy of fire insurance.
The defendant issued to Ellen Foley a “California Standard Form of County Fire Insurance Policy” covering a dwelling house in Sonoma County and furniture, family stores, wearing apparel and like articles within the dwelling house for the period from October 17, 1933 to October 17, 1936. The policy contains a clause that: “Unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon, or added hereto this company shall not be liable for loss or damage occurring . . .…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Herrman v. . Adriatic Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Continental Insurance Co. of New York v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Hudson Ins. Co. v. McKnightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Mauck v. Northwestern National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Williams v. Pioneer Co-operative Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Walter Myers v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company, an Insurance Company Doing Business in IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Aaby v. States Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Estate of Luster v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.