Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Ransohoff

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1937No. Civ. 9950PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The County of Los Angeles brought this action to collect an unsecured personal property tax amounting with penalties to $1608.67, levied on defendants’ property for county purposes for the year 1933-34. The defendants challenged the validity of the tax upon the ground that the assessment upon which it was based was arbitrary, excessive, and fraudulent, and was fixed pursuant to an illegal method. The trial court in effect so found, and entered judgment in favor of defendants, from which the county appeals.

Summarized, the points urged for reversal are: first, that the application filed by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. County of Los Angeles v. BallerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Birch v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Mahoney v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Rittersbacher v. Bd. of Supervisors of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bandini Estate Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Midstate Theatres, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API