Legal Opinion

Ringel v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1942No. Civ. No. 12213PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff seeks a writ of mandate to compel the respondent to enter a final decree of divorce nunc pro tunc as of April 2, 1932. Though an answer was filed to the petition it raised no real issue, and, since it was submitted without proof, the cause will be treated as before us on the petition which we will treat as not controverted, as though submitted upon demurrer.

Prom the petition and the affidavit of petitioner filed with the application in the superior court it appears that on April *352, 1931, an interlocutory decree of divorce was duly entered in the cause entitled Clyde Ringel v. Edna M.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Claudius v. MelvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Keller v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. MacEdo v. MacEdoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cornell v. CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Adoption of GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hamrick v. HamrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Cahoon v. PeltonUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API