Legal Opinion

Claudius v. Melvin

California Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1905No. S.F. No. 4073PublishedCited by 33 opinions

WRIT OF MANDATE to a Judge of the Superior Court of Alameda County. Henry A. Melvin, Judge. The facts are stated in the Opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an original proceeding in this court to obtain a writ of mandate to compel the defendant, as judge of the superior court, to make and cause to be entered a final judgment of divorce in an action in the superior court of Alameda County, wherein P. Claudius is plaintiff and Gesine Claudius is defendant.

The case is submitted to us upon a demurrer to the petition. The facts are as follows: The action for divorce was commenced on August. 14, 1903. The defendant was duly served with summons, and on August 27, 1903, her default was duly entered for failure to appear or answer. The matter was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Ex parte RosenheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People ex rel. Schwartz v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Anderson v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Olson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. In Re Estate of DargieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Hull v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API