Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Armstrong
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 1948No. Civ. 13531; Civ. 13532PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Two appeals are here presented: one from a final decree of divorce entered on March 11, 1947, nunc pro tunc as of January 25,1925, in the action entitled Fred Gibson Armstrong v. Marie Hansen Armstrong; and the other from an order allowing temporary alimony, attorney’s fees and costs to defendant in the action entitled Fred G. Armstrong v. Mary S. Armstrong.
Fred Gibson Armstrong married Marie Hansen on March 16,1922, and obtained an interlocutory decree of divorce from her on January 24, 1924. Without the entry of a final decree of divorce Armstrong married the respondent on April 27, 1925.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Union Oil Associates v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Holmes v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gilgert v. Stockton Port DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wilkoff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Usher v. Department of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Hurst v. HurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Hamrick v. HamrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.