Legal Opinion

Valbuena v. Ocwen Loan Servicing CA2/5

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 2015No. B256378UnpublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOODMAN, J.* —

Plaintiffs Amado and Myma Valbuena sued Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (Ocwen), following their lender’s purchase of their residence at a nonjudicial foreclosure sale. They allege that Ocwen violated Civil Code section 2923.6, the prohibition on “dual tracking” contained in the Homeowner Bill of Rights, when it conducted a foreclosure sale of their property while their loan modification application was pending. The trial court sustained Ocwen’s demurrer, ruling that plaintiffs’ failure to allege tender of the loan balance defeated their claims. We disagree, and so reverse the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Siliga v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. United States Cold Storage v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Green v. Central Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Schmidt v. CitiBank, N.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Osborne v. YasmehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. (PS) Hoggan v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Adams v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API