Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. CitiBank, N.A.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided November 7, 2018No. D072993PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAaron, J.
*1112I.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs David and Hedda Schmidt appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendants Citibank, N.A., as Trustee for Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Trust 2007-AR3 Mortgage Pass Through Certificates Series 2007-AR3, and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (defendants).
The Schmidts filed this action against the defendants, alleging violations of the Homeowners' Bill of Rights (HBOR; Civ. Code, §§ 2923.55, 2923.6 ) and Business and Professions Code section 17200, and seeking to prevent the completion of a trustee's sale of their residence.
The defendants moved for summary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Conroy v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Thurman v. Bayshore Transit Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Billesbach v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Chambers v. Crown Asset Management, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- De Meo v. Cooley LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Donnell v. Four Seasons Healthcare etc. CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Ducksworth v. Tri-Modal Distribution ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.