Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of H.S.H.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 2000No. C0-99-1291PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

H.S.H. appeals from a judgment certifying her as an adult in connection with several check forgery offenses she committed in October 1998, when she was 17 years old. She argues that the district court abused its discretion in certifying her because the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that retaining her in the juvenile system would not serve public safety, as required by Minn. Stat. § 260.125 (1998).

Because the state failed to establish that appellant is a present or future threat to public safety, we reverse the district court’s certification…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of J.L.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. In Re Welfare of D.M.D.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. In Re the Welfare of K.J.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. In Re the Welfare of S.J.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Matter of the Welfare of R.D.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Welfare of P.C.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In re the Welfare of R.D.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  3. In re the Welfare of J.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  4. In the Matter of the Welfare of: J.C., Child.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API