Legal Opinion
In Re Welfare of D.M.D.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 16, 2000No. C4-98-1185PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a court of appeals decision reversing the juvenile court’s grant of the prosecutor’s motion to designate the juvenile court proceedings as an Extended Jurisdiction Juvenile (EJJ) prosecution. We reverse the court of appeals and affirm the juvenile court’s EJJ designation.
On March 18 or 19 and June 21 of 1997, respondent D.M.D., Jr., then fourteen, was alleged to have penetrated an eight-year-old girl digitally and with his penis while babysitting her and her two siblings. On January 23, 1998, respondent was charged *434with two counts of criminal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HoganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Matter of Welfare of DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re the Welfare of J. F. K.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- In re the Welfare of S.W.N.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re M.I.Illinois Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re the Welfare of N.J.S.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In re the Welfare of J.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In re the Welfare of P.C.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re the Welfare of H.S.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.