Legal Opinion
In re the Welfare of R.D.M.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 28, 2013No. A12-1232PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the juvenile court’s order certifying the underlying delinquency proceeding for action under the laws and court procedures controlling adult criminal violations.1 He argues that the juvenile court lost subject-matter jurisdiction when it failed to hold a hearing on the state’s certification motion within the deadlines prescribed by Minn.Stat. § 260B.125, subd. 2(4). He also argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion by certifying the proceeding. Because appellant did not challenge the timeliness of the certification hearing in juvenile…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Vang v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. G. G., Child.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: J.C., Child.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015