Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of K.J.K.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1985No. C7-84-800, CX-84-824PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

K.J.K. appeals from two juvenile court orders referring him for prosecution as an adult as provided by Minn.Stat. § 260.125, subd. 2(d) (Supp.1983), for the offenses of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and felonious possession of stolen property. K.J.K. contends that (1) the State failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is not suitable for treatment in the juvenile system, and (2) prosecution as an adult would violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. We affirm.

FACTS

On October 14, 1983, a delinquency petition charging K.J.K. with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In Re Welfare of IQSSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Matter of Welfare of HaalandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Matter of Welfare of HartungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of the Welfare of R.D.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. In Re the Welfare of H.S.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. In Re the Welfare of M.J.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Matter of Welfare of TRCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. In Re the Welfare of S.R.L.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API