Legal Opinion
Matter of the Welfare of R.D.W.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 2, 1987No. C1-86-1767PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
R.D.W appeals from a court order referring him for prosecution as an adult as provided by Minn.Stat. § 260.125, subd. 2 (1986). We reverse.
FACTS
The juvenile appellant was charged by petition in McLeod County with two counts of sale of a controlled substance, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd. 1(1) (1984), occurring on May 10th and August 27th of 1985. Appellant was 17 years old at the time of the first offense, but the petition was not filed until June 23, 1986, more than a year after the offense was allegedly committed. The State filed a motion for adult reference…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. HoganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Doe v. MadonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In Re the Welfare of K. P. H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In Re the Welfare of S. V.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of D.F.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re the Welfare of U.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- In re the Welfare of S.W.N.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re the Welfare of H.S.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re the Welfare of S.E.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.