Legal Opinion

Atkins Ford Sales, Inc. v. Royster

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 16, 1990No. 88-1292PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Royster sued Charles Atkins and Atkins Ford Sales, Inc., based upon alleged defamatory statements. The jury awarded Royster $100,000 in compensatory damages and $50,000 in punitive damages. The court entered a judgment on that verdict. The defendants moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or a new trial, or, in the alternative, for a remittitur. The circuit court denied the motion, and the defendants appealed.

Although the testimony in this case conflicted at times, the evidence tended to show the following: Paul Royster was employed in the tractor parts department at…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Nelson v. Lapeyrouse Grain Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Berry v. City of New York Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Butler v. Town of ArgoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Rowe v. IsbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Crutcher v. Wendy's of North Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Ex Parte Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Al.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Dolgencorp, LLC v. SpenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API