Nelson v. Lapeyrouse Grain Corp.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
Jerry Nelson appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Lapeyrouse Grain Corporation, George Brothers, Noah Jacobs, and P.J. Hanson, in a defamation action. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Summary judgment is proper if there is no genuine issue of material fact as to any element of the affirmative defense of privilege or if there is no evidence tending to establish each element of defamation, and the moving party is entitled to a…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Butler v. Town of ArgoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Rice v. HodappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Commodore v. University Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Drill Parts and Service Co. v. Joy Mfg.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.