Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Isbell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 22, 1992No. 1910478PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rita Rowe sued John Isbell, owner of Cullman Discount Pharmacy, Inc., alleging libel and slander. Isbell moved for a summary judgment "based on the pleadings and the excerpts of Rowe's deposition, quoted in the brief submitted in support of [his] motion." The trial court, relying primarily on deposition testimony, granted the motion. Rowe appeals from the resulting judgment.

We note that Rowe argues, and Isbell acknowledges, that the deposition testimony was not "on file" with the trial court when the motion was submitted. Therefore, the only evidence available to the trial court at the time…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Lapeyrouse Grain Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Willis v. Demopolis Nursing Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. McDaniel v. Crescent Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Atkins Ford Sales, Inc. v. RoysterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. K-Mart Corp., Inc. v. PendergrassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. TranSouth Financial Corp. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Ex Parte RizkSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Teplick v. MoultonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  5. Ex Parte HaylesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API