Legal Opinion

State v. Joyner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 15, 1980No. 109PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Defendant assigns as error various rulings on the admission and exclusion of evidence, the denial of his motion to dismiss for insufficiency of evidence, and portions of the court’s charge to the jury. For reasons stated in the opinion, we find that defendant’s trial was free from prejudicial error.

Evidence for the state tended to show the following: At approximately 4:42 a.m. on 22 April 1979, Helen Young was awakened in her apartment in High Point, North Carolina, by a black male wearing a toboggan and a jogging suit. Ms. Young testified that the man had an object in his hand…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. People v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API