Legal Opinion
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Pittsburgh v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 28, 1986No. 85 Civ. 4163 (MEL)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL H. DOLINGER, United States Magistrate:
Three savings and loan associations and the City of Farmington, New Mexico commenced this action in 1985 to recover for losses incurred as a result of the financial collapse of Comark, a California-based government securities dealer. The plaintiffs were customers of Comark and seek to hold Comark’s former auditor — Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. (“OAD”) — responsible for their damages based on a variety of federal statutory and state com*559mon-law and statutory causes of action.1 In its turn OAD has impleaded the former general partners of Comark —…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Zachair, Ltd. v. DriggsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Parker v. M & T CHEMICALS, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Sabree v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local No. 33District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Burke v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Diversified Group, Inc. v. DaugerdasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.