Legal Opinion

Carlton v. Parker Dairy Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1962No. Docket No. 85, Calendar No. 48,791PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiff, a minor, by her guardian,, sued, defendant company for damages resulting-*24from injuries sustained when she attempted to raise a metal Venetian blind on defendant’s premises and it fell, striking her face and head,

Plaintiff’s declaration alleged that when the accident occurred she was lawfully upon defendant’s premises, that she had a right to attempt to raise the blind, that it was defendant’s duty to keep the blind in a reasonably safe condition so that it could be used safely by her, and that defendant negligently, recklessly and wilfully, in disregard of its duty to 'her, kept…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Munson v. ChristieMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Thomas v. Morton Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Thomas v. Morton Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Dershowitz v. Ford Motor CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pratts v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
  2. Jensen v. Sport Bowl, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Jensen v. Sport Bowl, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Pratts v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API