Hawks v. McCormack
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment. of the district court sustaining a motion to amend or correct a journal entry of judgment by an order entered nunc pro tunc.
Tlie action out of which the order arose was for a writ of mandamus. Therein O. B. McCormack was plaintiff and Sam Hawks et al., as members of the State Highway Commission, were defendants.
Plaintiff sought the writ, to compel defendants to pay him certain sums of money claimed to bo due him for certain state 'highway construction work done by plaintiff under a contract with the State Highway Commission.
The petition for the writ…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Anthony Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Courtney v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Woodmansee v. WoodmanseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cartwright v. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Stevens Expert Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Stork v. StorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Hawkins v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.