Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Hurst

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 31, 1970No. 42413PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice.

This appeal results from the district court’s denial of an “Application to Reform Judgment and, in lieu thereof, Petition for Breach of Contract,” filed by Foy E. Hawkins (the plaintiff in error herein) in an automobile-collision case in which he and his son, Jerell W. Hawkins (who is not involved in this phase of the case), were the defendants, and Marjorie M. Hurst (the defendant in error herein) was the plaintiff. The judgment mentioned in that instrument was in favor of the plaintiff and against both defendants.

In the journal entry of the order of denial involved herein,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stevens Expert Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Hawks v. McCormackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Davis v. SandlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Fowler v. GoldfederSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Salyer v. National Trailer Convoy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Pierson v. CanuppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API