Hawkins v. Hurst
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
This appeal results from the district court’s denial of an “Application to Reform Judgment and, in lieu thereof, Petition for Breach of Contract,” filed by Foy E. Hawkins (the plaintiff in error herein) in an automobile-collision case in which he and his son, Jerell W. Hawkins (who is not involved in this phase of the case), were the defendants, and Marjorie M. Hurst (the defendant in error herein) was the plaintiff. The judgment mentioned in that instrument was in favor of the plaintiff and against both defendants.
In the journal entry of the order of denial involved herein,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stevens Expert Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Hawks v. McCormackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Davis v. SandlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Fowler v. GoldfederSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
3Cited by26 opinions
- Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Salyer v. National Trailer Convoy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Pierson v. CanuppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.