Legal Opinion

Woodmansee v. Woodmansee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1929No. 18404PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFENDAFFER, C.

On June 29, 1914, Tsa-Me-Tsa (Mary Buffalo), an Osage Indian, then a little past 15 years of age, and Manderville Woodmansee, were married at Independence, Kan. On November 21, 1916, she filed in the district court of Osage county a verified petition for divorce. As grounds therefor, she alleged abandonment for more than one year and extreme cruelty. She also made certain allegations to the effect that defendant had willfully misrepresented her age at the time he procured the marriage license, and that defendant had falsely and fraudulently represented to plaintiff that she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Anthony Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Courtney v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Frederick & Nelson v. BardOregon Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. McCullough v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Mullins v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Stork v. StorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Werfelman v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API