Legal Opinion

Stork v. Stork

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 14, 1995No. 82680PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

This certiorari presses for our decision two . issues: (1) Did the trial court err in refusing to correct nunc pro tunc the divorce decree’s stated date for the commencement of support alimony payments? and (2) Is the plaintiff entitled to a counsel-fee award and litigation expenses incurred in this appeal? We answer both questions in the negative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

Walter and Barbara Stork [husband and wife] were divorced by consent decree entered on November 27, 1979, which was first signed by the parties and their counsel and then submitted to the trial judge for his…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Daniel v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Larman v. LarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API