Stork v. Stork
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
This certiorari presses for our decision two . issues: (1) Did the trial court err in refusing to correct nunc pro tunc the divorce decree’s stated date for the commencement of support alimony payments? and (2) Is the plaintiff entitled to a counsel-fee award and litigation expenses incurred in this appeal? We answer both questions in the negative.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
Walter and Barbara Stork [husband and wife] were divorced by consent decree entered on November 27, 1979, which was first signed by the parties and their counsel and then submitted to the trial judge for his…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Daniel v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Larman v. LarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.