Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Bolen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1915No. Civil No. 1407PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Pima. W. A. O’Connor, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

This is an action to cancel a note and mortgage made and delivered by appellee to the appellant on June 26, 1912, for $1,000, bearing 8 per cent interest, and payable on or before three years after date. It would serve no useful purpose to set forth the entire pleadings, and we will therefore give only enough of them to suggest the material points raised on appeal. The complaint alleges that the note and mortgage security were given for future advances to be *15made by appellant for the use and benefit of appellees,’-and that the consideration had failed in that no advances had been made; that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Aultman Thrashing & Engine Co. v. KnollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Eads v. MurphyArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  3. White v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Miners Nat. Bank v. ProulxMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rouse v. BolenArizona Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API