Legal Opinion

Aultman Thrashing & Engine Co. v. Knoll

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1905No. 13,988PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error from Ottawa district court; Rollin R. Rees, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

Henry Knoll successfully resisted the payment of a promissory note given to W. M. Smith, and indorsed to the plaintiff, on the ground of a failure of consideration. The questions in the case are whether an oral agreement furnishing the consideration of the note can be repudiated by the plaintiff, and whether evidence relating to the agreement contradicts the written promise. The verdict, the special findings of the jury and the judgment rendered after a motion for new trial all being for the defendant, only the evidence in his favor need be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Des Moines National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Babcock v. D. Deford & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  3. Hoosac Mining & Milling Co. v. DonatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  5. Thomas Kane & Co. v. BarstowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Will v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. Greep v. BrunsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Grandi v. LeSageNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Whitcomb v. OllerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Adrian v. ElmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API