White v. Rutherford

(after stating the facts as above). The points made on appeal are, in effect, that the cancellation of the deed to the 100. acres of land was not justified, because, namely:(1) Tbe services rendered by B. B. White as agent constituted a sufficient consideration to sustain tbe deed, as tbe evidence established that be was not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting tbe vendor’s lien note.(2) There was proven to be no fraud committed nor fraudulent representation made by B. B. White affecting the vendor’s lien note; and the conveyance of land by a warranty deed cannot be rescinded…