Legal Opinion

State v. Eakins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1977No. 45PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

By his first assignment of error defendant contends that the trial judge erred in charging that the jury should carefully consider and scrutinize the testimony of defendant and those closely related to him. The portion of the charge questioned by this assignment of error is as follows:

When you come to consider the evidence and the weight you will give to the testimony of the different witnesses, the Court instructs you that it is your duty to carefully consider and scrutinize the testimony of a defendant when he testifies in his own behalf and also the testimony of those who…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. PakulskiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API