Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1935PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: When the case was called for trial, the defendant Jerry Furlough tendered a plea of nolo contendere ■on the charge of conspiracy, which was accepted by the State. He was later used as a witness for the prosecution.

The judgment against the defendant, Avery Kimrey, was suspended ■upon terms acceptable to him and his counsel, and apparently he has not .appealed. S. v. Rooks, 207 N. C., 275, 176 S. E., 752. Hence, the validity of the terms of suspension as to him, or whether they are accordant with what was said in S. v. McAfee, 189 N. C., 320, 127 N. C., 204,…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  4. State v. . WhitesideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. State v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1827

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API