United States v. Fung Chong Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1ConcurrenceHatfield, Judge
It is my view that all of the facts of importance in this case have been stated in the majority opinion, and I concur in all that is said therein.
Some reference is made in the dissenting opinion to the fact that in determining the issue in a case of this character it is the duty of the court to use common sense and common understanding. The observation is not a new one, but in order to be legally applicable it should be compatible with well-established principles of law.
In my opinion the Government has wholly failed to prove that the term “kumquat” is not within the common meaning of the term…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Lilly & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Hamfton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Seligmann v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.