Legal Opinion

State v. Chaffin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1972No. 71-471PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.

We affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Defendant raises several propositions of law, the first of which pertains to the bill of particulars filed by the state. In his request for a bill of particulars, defense counsel asked: “What, if any, scientific experiment was conducted to determine the nature of the alleged narcotic which the defendant allegedly had in his possession on January 23, 1970?” In response, the state answered, “Duquenois test was run.” In response to defendant’s further inquiry pertaining to the result of that test, the state answered that “the vegetation was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McDougle v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. SwigerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. John Kasper v. D. J. Brittain, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  5. State v. DerighterOhio Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. State v. PeterseimOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. HairstonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In re C.P.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. WeitbrechtOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. Patrick (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API