Legal Opinion

Evans v. Hood Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 2016No. B265222PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLLINS, J.—

INTRODUCTION

Kenneth Evans was diagnosed with asbestosis after a decades-long career working for Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). For about 35 percent of his employment, Evans worked alongside contractors who helped build and replace gas pipelines; some of those pipelines were covered in a coating that contained asbestos. Evans and his wife, remaining plaintiff *1026Dorothy Evans (together, plaintiffs), sued several contractors, alleging that they contributed to Evans’s asbestosis. By the end of the trial, the only remaining defendant was respondent Hood Corporation…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Farrell v. Johnson & JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  3. Belanger v. Biggs CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Burch v. CertainTeed Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Corley v. San Bernardino County Fire Protection Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API