Legal Opinion

Harrington v. City of Portland

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 23, 1987No. Civ. 87-516-FRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRYE, District Judge:

In the matters before the court:

1. Defendants Raymond M. Tercek and Charles Karl move to dismiss plaintiff, Penny E. Harrington’s, first claim for relief; and

2. Defendants Sidney I. Lezak, John C. Beatty, and H.D. Watson move to dismiss Harrington’s third claim for relief; and

3. Defendants City of Portland and Mayor J.E. (Bud) Clark move to dismiss Harrington’s second, third, fourth and fifth claims for relief.

Harrington seeks to recover damages under the following claims for relief:

First claim for relief against defendants Tercek, McPhee and Karl: Deprivation of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. GossDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  2. Harrington v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1988
  3. Harrington v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1988
  4. Teitel v. University of Houston Board of RegentsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
  5. Titus v. City of Prairie CityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API