Legal Opinion
Harrington v. City of Portland
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 8, 1988No. Civ. No. 87-516-FRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRYE, District Judge:
The matter before the court is defendants City of Portland and its Mayor, J.E. (Bud) Clark’s, motion to dismiss plaintiff, Penny E. Harrington’s, fourth claim for relief. In an opinion of October 23, 1987, 677 F.Supp. 1491, the court reviewed this motion to dismiss but deferred ruling and asked the parties to assist the court with further briefing. The parties responded with additional memoranda. The court is now prepared to rule upon the motion.
In her fourth claim for relief, Harrington alleges that she and Mayor Clark entered into an agreement whereby she would…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Nucorp Energy Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Kantor v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Harrington v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1987
- Burrell v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harrington v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1988